post show post

everyone

Hey Sam and friend,

I actually sent a contribution to Donna Edwards as soon as she got off the show. I am looking at the Sammycam right now and am hoping for the best in 2008.

Pat in California

Be back later

**
"Parodies for Peace Movement"
(It's called a protest movement.)
PEACHES (aka "Soft and Fuzzy Anonymous")

as always i love me some janeane.

just some
food for thought:
lifted from Daily Kos one day:
Virginia’s Baptists, and not James Madison, spearheaded the drive to supplement the Constitution with a Bill of Rights.
The Baptist passion for freedom of conscience led directly to the First Amendment;

In the early Republic, most Baptist comprised the religious left as champions for
church-state separation, and the Unitarians were on the religious right, demanding
a seat for God in government.

who knew huh

Vanity Fair interviews Larry Flynt: 'The other shoe's going to drop any day'

Pam's House Blend

The publisher of Hustler has been on the prowl to catch Republican sexual hypocrite for some time now. Most recently he trotted out former call girl Wendy Ellis who claimed she had a "business relationship" with moralist anti-gay Senator David Vitter. He also claims to have the gay goods on other closeted hypocrites.

......

And, you might ask, who is next on Flynt's list to expose? He does name three to Handy, but not for publication. What we do know:

* a Republican presidential candidate (woohoo!)
* a well-known Republican senator
* another "prominent conservative official" (this is described in the article as involving "hooker parties and no-tell-motel liaisons"

He says he's closest to confirming and revealing the closeted gay senator (and it's not Larry Craig, who Handy says refers to himself as a "practicing heterosexual"), and that:

"The other shoe's going to drop any day," Flynt says, speaking of the other senator. "It'll surprise a lot of people that he's gay. And I'll bet you he resigns the same day and rides off into the sunset. He won't be as stupid as Craig," who after an initial vow to leave office changed his mind and instead fought to reverse his guilty plea to disorderly conduct......

Free Democracy

Heads of state from Central America and the Caribbean have met in Cuba for a summit on a Venezuelan initiative to supply cheap oil to regional allies.
The initiative permits signatory countries to defer payment on 40% of the oil they buy from Venezuela for up to 25 years, paying interest of only 1%.

Cuba already receives all its oil for free in exchange for social services including the work of thousands of Cuban doctors.

And Caribbean islands such as Jamaica, Haiti and the Dominican Republic can pay their bills in part with products such as bananas and sugar.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7155706.stm

* First came the shock of the original disaster: the flood and the traumatic evacuation.

* Next came the “economic shock therapy”: using the window of opportunity opened up by the first shock to push through a rapid-fire attack on the city’s public services and spaces, most notably it’s homes, schools and hospitals.

* Now we see that as residents of New Orleans try to resist these attacks, they are being met with a third shock: the shock of the police baton and the Taser gun, used on the bodies of protestors outside New Orleans City Hall yesterday.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-klein/the-shock-doctrine-in-act_b_77...

Republican is a dirty word.

Fudge is in the frige, bar cookies are cooling.

Hot kitchen!!!

Olbermann special tonight on his Special Comments.

The market is up
Submitted by toniD on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 3:59pm.
227. What's causing that I wonder?
------
1.) Magic.
2.) Who cares? Up is up.
3.) Herd mentality.
4.) The mysterious Christmas Bump.
5.) The release of one tracking report or another that said something about something or other.
6.) If anyone knew the answer, s/he would have invested heavily yesterday and sold everything today at 3:58 p.m. Eastern Time.
----------------------------------
I asked for a penile implant for Christmas....
Submitted by Peter Dragon on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 4:19pm.
my wife got me a catheter.
------
I much prefer to read funny stuff rather than attempt to write it. (I'm a humor consumer through-and-through.) The only reason that I take shots at you ("you" being Peter Dragon) is to provoke you into writing something that will make me laugh.
------------------------------------
Edwards' case with girl injured in pool
Submitted by Niceflyer on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 5:00pm.
No, Sam. Unfortunately, Edwards did not manage to put all of these folks out of business. The same thing just happened to another small child in North Carolina a few weeks ago. (Innards sucked out by pool drain.)
------
With nothing more than some clever engineering, I see an opportunity to prevent injuries and provide a sex toy option for hot-tubbing males.
------------------------------------
Submitted by red on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 5:39pm.
I wonder if Randi's usual listeners like Sam's Show? He's liberal enough, and smart enough, and [gosh darn it, people like him because] he's not boring like some other AAR hosts.
------------------------------------
I always love it when
Submitted by Fernando on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 5:56pm.
people use the word befuddled.
------
Perhaps you have noticed (as have I) that no one ever says that s/he is fuddled? Or witched? We are ye olde beEnglished whether we beknownst it or not.

Will the grandchildren of grandchildren, should they find a way to scratch into existence, mock this generation?

KO is rocking.

I'm always a little muddled.

Dorothy: Toto? Toto's my dog.

Glinda: Well, I'm a little muddled. The Munchkins called me because a new witch has just dropped a house on the Wicked Witch of the East. And there's the house, and here you are, and that's all that's left of the Wicked Witch of the East. And so, what the Munchkins want to know is, are you a Good Witch or a Bad Witch?

fuddled

1) Confused. Perplexed.
2) Drunk or in a drunken state.

I need to declare definition 2.

**
"Parodies for Peace Movement"
(It's called a protest movement.)
PEACHES (aka "Soft and Fuzzy Anonymous")

the penile implant joke. I thought I set you up pretty good there.

Are you going somewhere for Christmas?

A Movement Built To Last

Submitted by Digby on December 21, 2007 - 1:13pm.

The release his past week of CAF's report on the Obstructionist Republicans seems to have gotten quite a bit of attention, even as the media continues to behave as if there's nothing unusual about it or, as Glenn Greenwald documents here, believe that Democrats are somehow equally responsible for the fact that Republicans are breaking records for filibusters. The question I find myself asking about this, however, is, why now?

What's different than any other time in history when there was a similar Senate minority with a member of its own party in the white house?

The first thing that stands out to me is the fact that the Republicans in the congress are willing to take the heat for obstructing popular legislation, even when they have an unpopular lame duck president of their own party who could veto it and let them off the hook. Normally politicians, survivalists that they are, would be trying to distance themselves from a 30% president by this time and he would be forced out there on his own. But here you have them racing over the cliff right along side him. That they have maintained such solidarity in the face of dramatic failure is quite impressive.

My suspicion is that they are banking on the media failing to properly inform the public about what is going on (and which I discuss in more depth here.) From the looks of things, that's been a pretty smart strategy. The public certainly holds the congressional Republicans in contempt, as you might expect after seven years of rubber stamping this failed presidency, but they are equally contemptuous of the Democrats for failing to turn things around when they took the reins. The Republicans apparently surmised that they could make the public see it as a wash.

The GOP presidential candidates have pretty much followed the same path. While it's certainly true that they are running for the support of their party's base at the moment, with a president at 30% you would think that they would at least be leaving themselves some daylight for the general election. But so far they are all running proudly as successors to a man whose fall from grace has been one of the most dramatic drops in presidential history.

If one assumes that we are dealing with a party and a political movement that operates as the constitution expected politicians to operate, this would all be very odd. But they aren't. The modern Republican party has somehow managed to create movement loyalty that supersedes not only the national interest but their own political self-interest.

http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/movement_built_last?tx=3

I do wonder about history.

Submitted by Fernando on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 8:08pm.

Will the grandchildren of grandchildren, should they find a way to scratch into existence, mock this generation?

____________________

Mockery?

For reactionary hyperventilating bedwetters and party-over-country demagogic liars?

Unrelenting merciless Vesuvian mockery is the very least of their chickenhawk due.

Keith didn't feel to shy tonight.

He could of worn a speedo and been less objectionable to the administration. Other than that, prolly not possible.

Their treatment by this government is continued HORRID. By this Evil Bush's Adm ... they will be judged harshly/|\
The images "haunt".

hyperventilating bedwetters is a good description.

Using race though? GeeBuzz. I would have thought those stupid flat earther's would have found out that strategy was a stupid one. Amazed by it's effectiveness. Momma told me it was worse than I would expect.

I am a guest this year. My Nephews are throwing the Christmas party.

Christmas eve my family will stop by here before they go to the relatives from the other side so I am just serving appetizers. Christmas day I go to my Nephew's house.

Although I am making lots of stuff that has passed on from my parents.

And cookies!

I am hoping we can pull this one out. There's alot of stupid and/or uninterested people still.

I am hoping against what we need because it will be hard on this nation, however, I think we need a hard recession. This economy has to hit everyone for change to happen.

don't you think for posterity sake at the very least you could post your home recipe?

and a real 'war on Christmas'--complete with Medal of Freedom winners.

Twenty-three soldiers from the Seventh Calvary were later awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for the slaughter of defenseless Indians at Wounded Knee.

The wounded and dying were taken to a makeshift hospital in the Pine Ridge Episcopal Church. Ironically, above the pulpit hung a Christmas banner which read:

Peace on Earth, Good Will to Men.

http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/acs/1890s/woundedknee/WKmscr.html

Lakota Freedom!
http://www.lakotafreedom.com/

Fernando?

Last Christmas I made a fmaily cookbook for thier Christmas gift. Had some photos also.

I'll send you one if you want one!

Actually it's mixed, some Greek, some Italian recipes.

My postings are loaded with typos today. It's foggy here with 100% humidity and it is sure effecting my hands and fingers tonight.

Well, the Repubs own the Courts, they own the media, and it looks like they own the Democrats. Another Great Depression will be a rude awakening for America. Perhaps it's the only way we'll change our misguided ways--our wastefulness and apathy.

It's sad we never seem to learn any lessons here. We Americans love entertainment and excitement, like little kids.

at what Kieth has given us. Honestly, I am taken aback.

Oh puhlez t. I like trying new foods. I'm very picky but I like many Greek/Mediterranean dishes.

That's a recipe I could use

I think on principle the country will revolt.

I personally know too many great Americans. Really great Americans. I bet you have that too toniD. People who recognize torture is not who we are. People who know that politicization of military and religion is fascist talk. Good Americans who don't fall for racism. I am secure in what it means to be American. This is just another test we will excel at in the end. But it won't be easy.

The recession is counter productive to hope. George put that there to slow us down.

Huckabee can do anything he wants to do with his ads.

That said, I am as strongly opposed to religion being injected into political and governmental processes as anyone can be. I freely admit that I am radical on this issue. It is for the same reason that I am radical about the sanctity of habeas corpus and due process and search-and-seizure: The negative influences of these issues are parasitic and omnipresent in their attempts to gain a foothold. It is much safer to say, "Not now or ever" than to say, "Just this once won't hurt."

So, back to Huckabee and his "floating cross".

First, can any video editor (I'm asking for comments from professionals, here) honestly tell me that the floating cross went unnoticed in the first viewing following the shoot?

Second, (again, for the video-editing pro's) can anyone tell me that, if the glowing cross were, instead, a glowing pentagram or a glowing Star of David, that it would have gone unnoticed following the shoot?

What if it were a glowing ankh? Or a dayglo Grateful Dead poster (Huckabee is, famously, a musician not afraid of electric Rock music).

My conclusion? It was a cheap shot. Even if it was not staged before the fact, it was recognized for what it was before it went public.

Which brings me back to my radical concerns. Not only is Huckabee injecting his religion into his campaign even as Romney tries to downplay his, he is also exploiting it crassly.

On the one hand, the argument could be made that religious exploitation is justified if the U.S. citizenry elects a candidate who proves to be a wonderful President.

On the other hand, the argument could be made that a candidate's religious exploitation didn't work out so good the last time around.

I don't want to know about a candidate's religious beliefs. I also don't want to know about a candidate's preferred copulation techniques. Similarly, I don't want to know how often a candidate eats meat or shellfish, if at all. The various preferences are culturally induced and, for the most part, outside of the candidate's control. I can't explain my own preferences except to say that they are the sum total of a lot of influences, mostly outside of my control.

Some would argue that the candidate's revelation of these details gives the voter an insight into "character". I would argue that they give me insight into a whore-ish lack thereof.

Here is what I want to know about a candidate:

1.) Does your party affiliation trump your citizenship?
2.) Does your ideology recognize that there will always be a certain percentage of the people in a society who need help, and are you willing to risk enabling slackers in the effort to aid the downtrodden and underprivileged?
3.) Does your ideology assume that you can cause death and misery to promote life and happiness?
4.) Do you view the Presidency as a seat of powerful mediation between disparate opinions or as a seat of demanding decrees?

Using religion to gain the nomination is insulting (to me) and far afield of the information that we need to know. It should be just as insulting to the religious among the electorate.

of the Clinton years. Think about it. Everyone seemed to be doing well financially. But the control of congress was in the hands of the Newt group.

Was it a way of anesthetizing people for the grand plan? People doing well won't pay as much attention to politics.

Clinton with Nafta pushed through congress very fast without questions. People were sold a bill of goods that global trade, free trade, would make us richer.

The repubs claimed that it was the congress and not Clinton that drove that economy. Did they? Did they conspire to end it for thoer grand plan? We had a tech bubble going and it started to crash in 99. The impeachment of Clinton was to stop him from doing alot of things he could have done to change what congress was passing. He was too busy defending himself.

Hillary was right when she said there was a right wing agenda.

bud... You wrote of a member of the Republican party. That's as good as it gets. Find a better candidate on that side. Go a head. Find a better nugget of turd than Huckelberry.

Then report back.

I have a great recipe for galatopouriko.

I have to get it out and will try to post on an open mic.

The lighting was dim except the spotlight on him. And that spot picked up the bookshelves behind him with the 3 glowing bulbs and the cross of the bookself.

Actually, whoever did that did a great job of videotaping. Very professional job.

But it was meant to be.

Wow
Submitted by toniD on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 8:54pm.
My postings are loaded with typos today. It's foggy here...
-----------
I nominate Heavy Fog as the most outrageous excuse for typos ever.

(The Rajah is kicking himself for being behind the curve.)

put your self in a republican's shoes. What choice is there?

A single trained [Blackwater?] marksman is suspected of killing seven British soldiers in separate attacks in Iraq, an inquest heard on Thursday. The sniper's victims are thought to include Cpl Rodney Wilson, who was killed when he was shot in the back while trying to rescue an injured colleague in Basra. Analysis of the bullet which struck him showed it was fired from the same American-made weapon which has been involved in the deaths of six other servicemen in the city. Cpl Wilson's father, Richard, said: 'It's almost certainly the same person firing it, some sort of hired shooter probably.' Cpl Wilson was hit by a 5.56 calibre bullet. The ammunition is compatible with weapons such as the M16 and M4 Carbine, commonly used by US forces, and the SA80, the standard British Army issue assault rifle.

www.legitgov.org

But choice is based on what you value. The greed of riches and power or the empathy of humanitarianism.

The problem is the salesman.

What are you doin' NOW to help women, Gare?

A Stanton For the Saudis

A Stanton For the Saudis 'n attackin' NOW with yer outrageous argument complete w/right-wingnut ideers?

What are they, NOW, doin' to help the women of the world?

I agree w/Echidne's snakilicious writin' onna the topic.
She sez it like it is!

Background:

Anne Applebaum gives American feminists a spanking for not doing enough to liberate the women of Saudi Arabia. She uses the example of the "Qatif girl", the woman who was gang-raped and then given 200 lashes and six months in prison for having been together with a man not her relative when the crime took place. The Qatif girl has now been pardoned, so the time is ripe for Applebaum to tell why American feminists failed in her case and more generally, in the case of helping all those unfortunate women not living in the United States.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Echidne of the Snakes sez:

What do you think kills more women in the United States? Or in the world?

Note first that the real and grave injustices that women still face: oppression, rape and even being killed for their gender in some countries, are somehow all problems that only the feminists should try to solve.

The rest of the society can just sit back and criticize the feminist attempts, almost like those ice-skating judges at the Olympics. Though of course they would applaud should the feminists actually solve all those frighteningly large problems, without much external funding and while being criticized of nitpicking and various forms of lunacy.

But are these problems not the responsibility of the rest of the humankind to solve?

It appears not. Only the feminists are expected to fix the world for billions of women.

WHY THE FUCK IS THE PLIGHT OF WOMEN ONLY THE BUSINESS OF FEMINISTS?

Women are the majority of this world's people.

Is it perfectly ok to oppress them, to traffic in them and to treat them like cowdung or bicycles, unless enough American feminists say otherwise and show themselves willing to sacrifice their lives for that cause?

Everyone else can just sit back with a cold beer and some nice popcorn to watch, and then to grade the feminist performances?

All this reminds me of that earlier post I wrote in some anger, too, about feminists being needed for a cleanup in Aisle 8 of the great supermarket of life.

We are the night-time cleaning crew, expected to turn up with pails of water and brooms, but to be otherwise invisible.

Oh, and we are also whom to blame when everything doesn't sparkle and shine.

It's probably because we were fighting over male-only golf clubs that women die in Saudi Arabia.

h/t to Echidne of the Snakes for expressin' my thoughts on the topic.

Warnin': Real feminists post there. Smart, sassy, and peachy keen.

http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2007_12_01_archive.html#415099650...

**
"Parodies for Peace Movement"
(It's called a protest movement.)
PEACHES (aka "Soft and Fuzzy Anonymous")

Katherine Harris on Sam Seder's show: Has she come unhinged? Listening to her was downright scary

Fooled this person

haven't you received the latest book of words? Empathy was taken out revisions ago. I think it's illegal to try to define it again. You must be very fast scurrying under your bed when the disappearing types come.

GREAT POST, Peaches.

8-)

...I've been out pounding down pints of Guinness
...Listening to a band called "Death by Banjo"
...Got up a 4 a.m.
...Have already lost my stream of consciousness

Oh fuck it. Cheers and good night!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Crank, easy
Submitted by Fernando on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 9:18pm.
bud... You wrote of a member of the Republican party. That's as good as it gets. Find a better candidate on that side. Go a head. Find a better nugget of turd than Huckelberry. Then report back.
--------
I try to examine it all. Which brings me to a comment that I have attempted to convey many times with many people but without much success.

There are two major subjects as concerns candidacies and political maneuvering in general.

1.) Tactical maneuvering for political gain, without regard to governance itself.

2.) Governance, as a philosophical and practical effort.

Allow me to use Huckabee as an example. The glowing cross advertisement is clearly a tactical maneuver that has no relationship with his ability to govern. It is all about gathering votes.

However, when Huckabee was Governor of Arkansas, he supported the idea of providing the children of Arkansas-resident undocumented aliens (specifically the children who had been schooled throughout their lifetimes in U.S. public schools) with in-state tuition advantages when applying to Arkansas universities. If I were his political tactician, I would have said, "Are you out of your fucking mind!?" That's pretty much what the people in Arkansas said, too.

Huckabee's argument was (and it still is valid), since these kids are Americans by birth and since they are a piece of America's future, it makes no economic sense to force them to be something less than an asset to the nation.

His detractors countered that giving more advantages to people (and their eventual offspring) who cross the border without proper papers only encourages more people to do the same.

In my opinion, Huckabee was being pragmatic with the circumstances as they existed. There is no reason why the legislation could not have been written so that students in the future did not have the same in-state tuition advantage. He was trying to deal with an existing situation on behalf of the nation as a whole.

But from the politically tactical side of the coin, it was suicide.

Which brings me back to the two-sided coin of acting on behalf of personal (or party) political advantage, or acting on behalf of the nation. Sometimes there is a grey area that blends the two (like, for instance, lying to get elected and then becoming a wonderful official).

The point is this: There are two worlds that rarely intersect. There is the pragmatic world of political flimflam and there is the philosophical world of actual governance. If I determine that Huckabee is a whore-ish sack of shit for using the glowing cross in his tactically-designed campaign advertisement, my determination ignores the possibilities of his governance should he be elected.

The difficulty in discussing candidacies is the fact that the discussion shifts, willy-nilly, between the Methodology of politics and the actual governance that might occur.

And, for the record, I don't want to see Huckabee as POTUS. I could just as easily have used the whore-ish campaign tactics of any other candidate as an example, as well as something that s/he had done while governing that was positive and helpful to us all. It is very frustrating that our system teaches political hopefuls to say that which is the least offensive to the most people in the electorate. Anyone who doesn't, like Kucinich and Paul, doesn't stand a chance.

Good one Kevin.. :)

Funny comments..

"Hello to our friends and fans in domestic surveillance."

I seem to remember there was a lot of debate about Nafta. Including one very good one on Larry King's show between Ross Perot and Al Gore. Gore won the debate. Perot seemed mystified.

Anyway, the debate had been raging for years and years. All the Republican presidents had tried to get it passed, since Nixon. Carter, I don't know if he tried to get it passed or not. But it seems to me it was bound to happen sooner or later - it just so happened to pass on Clinton's watch. They did a good job selling it to the public and one of their strongest selling points was (both Clinton and Gore said this) that if it's found to not be working, we can always stop it.

I didn't believe at the time that anyone would ever stop it, no matter if it was working properly or not - but that argument seemed to satisfy most people.

Sorry if this doesn't make much sense. I'm drowzy. Full of GABA.

What are you doin' NOW to help women?
Submitted by Peaches Pseudonymous on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 9:39pm.
--------
(Insert any of a number of remarks here that would cause me no end of grief.)

yeah, but find a better Republican.

They are all muppets at best.

Nice job Kevin. That is some funny stuff going on there at DU.

Clinton Nafta Debates
Submitted by mystic23 on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 10:22pm.
...I didn't believe at the time that anyone would ever stop it, no matter if it was working properly or not - but that argument seemed to satisfy most people...
--------
You identify one of the failings of U.S. governance. Instituting legislation is difficult but un-instituting legislation is damned near impossible.

In a not-perfect-but-better-than-we-got world, there would be benchmarks implanted into legislation which would, if not met after implementation, sunset the legislation on a date certain.

It would force a reexamination prior to re-legislating a renewal of the idea, or re-legislating a modified version of the idea, or allowing the idea to die.

Submitted by Fernando on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 9:13pm
The recession is counter productive to hope. George put that there to slow us down.

I am even suspect
Submitted by toniD on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 9:13pm.
of the Clinton years. Think about it. Everyone seemed to be doing well financially. But the control of congress was in the hands of the Newt group.
------------------------------------------------
i recently was given the DVD for a movie called ENDGAME
seems its an Alex(Brown?) the guy from prisonplanet
movie about the Bilderberger group it was very long
but one thing i remember was it showed hillary was at a meeting
maybe last year and they mentioned how not one president
since it was established ever became president without attending at least one of the very secretive meetings
but the reson i'm posting it in reference to both of your postings was how the whole economy is twisted at their will
to put it in my own words and so if the economy is good its their doing and if the economy is bad is too is from their doings.needless to say an economic downturn coupled with
millions who have lost homes just helps them solidify their own power, in other words they benefit at the expense of others
and by benefit i mean rule the world while we cerfs serve them and bow to them thanking them for our very existence.
talk about an endgame

Submitted by Fernando on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 10:47pm.
yeah, but find a better Republican.
-----------
I assume that you are cracking wise?

Asking me to find a better Republican candidate for the presidency than Huckabee is like asking me to find a better tick to attach itself to my scrotum.

Another Great Post..

I see that Coulter and Limbaugh hate Huckabee.

Coulter hates him because he isn't a Xtian that hates everyone.

Limbaugh hates Hukabee because he doesn't whoreship Limbaugh.

I am just enjoying the Rightards destroy each other and their Candidates.

A tick is a blood-sucking arachnid that you don't want on your scrotum.

I got a phone call that lasted awhile so this is late and in your area it might be over but it's on now in my area. You can also watch it on line.

Talking about the power of the presidency and the congress

If your not a member of DU ... it's a good place to join. A lot of forums there and has something for everyone.

Bill Scher and a lot of other's like him post there.

In December of 1998, the House of Representatives, through a bill authored by serial adulterer Henry Hyde, during a lame-duck session of Congress where Speaker and serial adulterer Newt Gingrich (who started up with a mistress while his wife was in the hospital with cancer) had to hand over his gavel to Ray LaHood, during a floor debate marred by the resignation of potential House Speaker candidate and serial adulterer Bob Livingston, voted to impeach the President of the United Statesfor only the second time in American history. The count was 228-206 on the perjury charge, and 221-212 on obstruction of justice (two other counts failed). Being the anniversary week, C-SPAN decided to air large portions of the House debate.

I couldn't stop watching.

www.dailykos.com

Those DU comments were hysterical!! People actually believed that was Katherine Harris. Haha!

Send that to Sam.

PTA's best movie... EVER.

Crank Bait submits:

Tyrone F. Horneigh And Walnettos

What are you doin' NOW to help women?
Submitted by Peaches Pseudonymous on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 9:39pm.
--------
(Insert any of a number of remarks here that would cause me no end of grief.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tyrone F. Horneigh ~

Is that yer real name or yer pseudonymous name that you write under?

Tyrone F. Horneigh and the Walnettos coulda be the name of yer band!

Heavy Metal Mebbe? Parody 'n Fun Band Mebbe?

~~~~

Crank Bait's prolly wiser than Fred tho'.

Woulda yer remarks be better than Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson's remarks 'bout his most prized possession?

Do you know what Fred sez inna his remarks 'bout his most prized possession?

(Of course, his camp sez it twere tongue-in-cheek!)

"Trophy wife."

Good Grief!

**
"Parodies for Peace Movement"
(It's called a protest movement.)
PEACHES (aka "Soft and Fuzzy Anonymous")

Story

Scroll down to the bottom..See Permalink..Click on that..It sends you to the link to the story..
Copy and paste that puppy into your post..
Alot of the times you have to click on the Headline of The Post,to get the Permalink..
You'll get the hang of it.. :)

Clinton Impeachment - 9 Years Ago This Week
by dday
Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 05:55:58 PM PST
[Promoted from the Diaries by Meteor Blades]

In December of 1998, the House of Representatives, through a bill authored by serial adulterer Henry Hyde, during a lame-duck session of Congress where Speaker and serial adulterer Newt Gingrich (who started up with a mistress while his wife was in the hospital with cancer) had to hand over his gavel to Ray LaHood, during a floor debate marred by the resignation of potential House Speaker candidate and serial adulterer Bob Livingston, voted to impeach the President of the United States for only the second time in American history. The count was 228-206 on the perjury charge, and 221-212 on obstruction of justice (two other counts failed). Being the anniversary week, C-SPAN decided to air large portions of the House debate.

I couldn't stop watching.

dday's diary :: Permalink :: There's more...

"Hello to our friends and fans in domestic surveillance."

You bloated ass. I know what a tick is. Huckabee is a tick to his followers and some sheep. Drinks their scrotum blood. You are correct there my friend.

I'll thank you to warn the barn animals and not myself :)

I'm simply trying to insist that finding one better than another when one judging ticks or turd nuggets is not the endeavor of evolved folk. Stop contemplating that bugger. Its unseemly.

Who cares which simpleton they send up? Our challenge is within ranks.

Submitted by Fernando on Fri, 12/21/2007 - 11:30pm.
You bloated ass...
------
You force me to admit to an observation by myself and a friend many years ago.

It was during the era of ten-speed bicycles. I was on summer break from college and he was on break from getting high, briefly. Not that I wasn't.

We travelled miles of paved country roads without concern for where we were going or when we would return. It was really hot. The pavement was oozing oil. We didn't have helmets or Spandex or water bottles or any of the newfangled stuff. We decided to rest. It was a serene scene befitting a Zig-Zag ad (for tobacco use only).

We sat our asses down on the roadway. Traffic was non-existent. We were sweaty and happy and full of our young selves. Then my friend said, "Look!" as he pointed to the tarmac between us and the ditch.

Three ticks were marching with determination in our direction, across hot tar and in blazing sun.

So, despite my wisecrack about Dallas suburbanites, I have no doubt that ticks would thumb the highway from Ft. Worth if they sensed your carbon dioxide-y breath wafting west out of Richardson.

I heard this today. I have no idea if it is accurate.

George Bush has been lower in approval ratings for longer than any president on record.

test

You need some NEW IT guys !

15 hrs do do maintenance ? Don't think so . :(

"Hello to our friends and fans in domestic surveillance."

...fuckin' hit alt-ctl-delete and get it over with! ;-) Or put it on a Mac cuz they "just work".

Just in time, crisis averted.

Whew!

Sites only been DOWN for over 16 hrs ? BS !

"Hello to our friends and fans in domestic surveillance."

tiffany
tiffany jewellery
tiffany uk
tiffany jewelllery uk
tiffany jewellery sale
tiffany jewellery london
silver jewellery
tiffany jewellery sale
ugg boots
uggs
ugg sale
ugg boots sale
uk ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
ugg australia
winter boots
ugg boots discount
tall ugg boots
ugg boots 2009
cheap uggs
uggs on sale
ugg uk
uggs boots
australia ugg boots