Your Majority Report- I promise never to sell or give your email address to any other person, org. or entity!
Sir Real - Am I Just Spinnin' My Own Wheels?
As I speak in metaphor, mine are sort of squeaking; and only perhaps 3 of the 4 are spinning in the same direction.
----------------------------------------------------------------
www.majorityreportradio.blogspot.com
(contains RECENTLY UPDATED Sam Seder Show Open Mic blogger links)
----------------------------------------------------------------
My kids are home today in solidarity with a city-wide Tucson teachers' strike
(aka "sick out",...or whatever one might call it.)
Over 800 teachers have called in sick already according to the news on my television.
I'm realizing that being on the Internet &/or computer is not that fulfilling anymore.
I've been maintaining a bunch of blogs for no apparent reason.
Perhaps it was an outlet of sorts for a few years,
but... I feel like I may possibly be faced with a dilemma.
I don't like the news I come across. Yet I still seek it out like a junkie.
I have been very serious about utilizing the tools laid out in the books,
"Ask and It is Given" & "Law of Attraction,"
...as well as the movie, "The Secret."
But, a year later, I'm still getting agitated daily,
and have not seen huge signs of progress in my life
by changing my thinking.
I've posted lots of Abraham-Hicks quotes & stuff all over the Internet,
primarily as a way for me to get the message to sink in to myself,
by spending so much time fucking around on the computer regarding a certain topic.
But, it's not like I've become some sort of expert or master of the material.
Far, far from it. Granted, I now change the channel on TV when I see violence,
and I turn my gaze away if I see a graphic, horrific image on the computer or TV,
...and I try not to obsess on the negative news &
the so-called bad guys running amuk on our planet,
most specifically our misLeaders in Washington,
nor do I dwell on conspiracies anymore, even as some of them are highly probable.
And even as I'm always looking forward to watching Countdown, or listening to Seder on Sundays.
But here's the thing,...believing something prior to any evidence confirming it
... could be construed as creating an ideology,
and then cherry-picking facts,
and focusing only in certain directions,
so as to only see evidence validating your ideology,
...may not actually be reality.
Which seems fine if you're trying to consciously create your future,
...by controlling your thoughts now.
As per authors such as Wallace Wattles, Napoleon Hill, Wayne Dyer,
Jerry & Esther Hicks, Jane Roberts, etc...
...But you've got world leaders & religious fundamentalists &
self-serving people conjuring up absurd, dangerous belief systems .
.. and then marketing these views to their hundreds of millions of believers
... and even cable news networks & mainstream media just making up stuff.
Which is basically pimping lies on the masses. And these lies have had harmful consequences.
Not to mention we've always had self-serving, New Age gurus...such as the Sri Rashneesh & the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, ... and cult leaders, etc..
which have given New Age & self-help teachers a bad name.
And, basically, the "good" guys & the "bad" guys are using the same methodology.
Ignoring the facts on the ground.
Abraham-Hicks would say "Don't focus on reality."
President Bunnypants would say "The surge is working."
Both seem to require quite the leap of faith. Based on ... belief.
And belief can be helpful. Or it can be dangerous.
And, it's is argued that all humans operate out of habit...based on conscious & unconscious beliefs...of which most of the beliefs are inaccurate...based on inadequate information & coming as a result of flaws in everybody's critical thinking faculties;
sometimes referred to as Projection. (...where everything we see gets filtered through our
pre-conceived notions & already established biases & beliefs regarding any situation.)
So. What to do? Just think & believe what you want? But, shut the fuck up about it?
Do as thou wilt? But, do not try to justify to others?
But, do not even let anyone know what you're thinking? Just do it? Just think it?
And see what happens. Just see if being more positive affects your life for the better?
Just see if when you choose to focus on positive things, more good things will happen around you? Don't get in a debate with others about it?
Don't try to justify your methods?
Well, that's probably the way to do it. Because, otherwise everyone is just going to think you're being indifferent to the bad news you hear about, &
just letting the bad guys win by brainwashing yourself that everything's all right.
It seems there's no way to stay positive, unless you just stay out of certain conversations. It's why there's been such a backlash against the movie, "The Secret,"...probably.
The argument is that people are being naive & not using their brains &
are being selfish, not helping fight social & economic injustices, etc...
Even as wifeybot & I are both advocates of the teachings of Abraham-Hicks &
the teachings of "The Law of Attraction",...she's a proud atheist & I'm not.
We both don't care for religion. But, she's against it,
& I think it's fine for others,
if it works for them.
She thinks people who believe in God & religions are stupid & gullible.
I don't think that at all.
She watches the news & likes to talk about sad, horrible stories she's heard.
And I don't wanna hear about it.
She'll watch Democracy Now! & Countdown with Keith Olbermann, but that's as far as she'll look into alternative, unreported mainstream news.
She discounts conspiracies & anything else that isn't broadcast on mainstream media without even taking a minute to look into the arguments posed by Jim Marrs or David Icke or
whatever is written at Rense.com.
I basically assume the TV and newspaper are lying to me, due to the interests of the billionaires who run them. She says I have no right to discount the news as not being accurate since I don't have any proof. But, she can discount the existence of God without any proof.
So, anyway there's an analysis to be done which must somehow account for why there is usefulness in ideologies, & huge danger in ideologies.
And how do you sort it out?
I'm starting to understand a bit more why a few people from the old Majority Report Radio (now called "Seder on Sundays") blog ... jumped all over my shit when I started talking about thinking better thoughts in order to "fight the power." I had concluded that all the negative attention that the Bunnypants Gang was getting, basically empowered them more.
Such as the anti-Bush election in 2004. Instead of the pro-Kerry election.
(Regardless of rigged voting machines & voter disenfranchisement,
Kerry still should have won by a ton a votes, even if millions of votes weren't counted.)
The Majority Report Radio bloggers' generalizations about all ideology being suspect, if not flat out dangerous, ... was not argued effectively, in my opinion.
Regardless,...they had a point.
But, then I guess that reminds me of a quote from Bob Proctor in "The Secret."
Re: electricity. He said: "Nobody understands how it works, but we all use it." ...
..."You can cook a man's dinner with electricity,...but you can also cook the man."
So where is this balance? This middle-ground.
Does everything boil down to human self-interest? To economic decision-making based on fear & greed?
It sure seems like it.
And it seems like these decisions are derived for the most part from inadequate information & faulty reasoning. But yet that's how it plays out on this planet.
The whole free market theory is based on the existence of some "invisible hand" which keeps the whole thing going using the assumption that everybody will act based on their own self-interest. And that this behavior ends up helping everyone.
Clearly there's flaws to this type of thinking....
'Cause otherwise this self-interest would lead to a rising tide that lifts all boats. And it doesn't.
The chaos caused by government deregulation has clearly shown that there needs to be some kind of mild regulation at times...as the corporate greedheads collude & run amuck.
But, the balance. Where is the balance? How does one find it?
Why is a State of the Union address from President Bunnypants undoubtably 99% bunk.
And why is the movie, "The Secret," undoubtably not? (Or is it?)
How is one to create a belief system devoid of irrational fear?
And how is it that the power of love supposedly can conquer all the lurking demons?
And, how does a passionate liberal not have his/her soul crushed by the news we all hear?
What is illusion? What is real? What is the most effective way to react?
Are we all the bad guys in this saga? Are we all responsible for all of this?
Is it something inside us all which we must change, for things to start getting better in the world?
Can everything bad in the world all be my fault?
I sure wish Abbie Hoffman was still around for all of this.
Some crazy antics might cheer me up.
(Although Medea Benjamin might just be catching her stride.)
And, I sure wish I could be more grateful for all the good things in my life that I take for granted, and focus more on the positive.
Old habits are hard to break, I guess.
- Sir Real's blog
- Login or register to post comments




Been There ......
I turn off all news except maybe some local news and that is limited to just a few minutes a day. I have also had blogs that I have created and then just left alone for months or deleted them. You can always start another one and go a different direction.
Everyone needs a break from the never ending cycle of Monotonous BS that is our world.
8-)
Thanks, Kevin.
What you said means a lot to me.
I think I'm gonna have to do that. :)
(As a sidenote: you know what my coping mechanism has been of late? I've been reading & re-reading Paul Krugman's book from 1999, called "The Return of Depression Economics," over and over again. It totally makes me feel better. It's not negative, as the title suggests, and it explains so much about history & economics, etc... And seems to totally explain the world today. It even, ironically, has a timely chapter in it called, "Masters of the Universe: Hedge Funds and other Villains.")
Hedge funds are a relatively new phenomena. (Basically, from the '80s,...) Soon after their inception, certain financial crises in the world started to emerge.
(In fact, the Asian crisis had just only recently begun: July 2, 1997...and Krugman's book came out in 1999.)
The financial crises started to begin just a few years after Greenspan appeared on the scene and tinkered with shit, creating all those goofy financial trading instruments that are wreaking havoc around the globe today. Where finance crap, like currencies, could be traded in the futures markets. Today we're in the process of going through the first global crisis resulting from the creation of these instruments.
And, of course, as a result of the mentality that deregulation is good for free markets.
And it must be bad, if Alan Greenspan has already come out publicly and apologized for being wrong about certain things he did.
Bunnypants' policies have been an equally destructive force, but we'll never hear him admit regret &/or mistakes made.
The cynical part is Greenspan knew better.
But he'll never dare admit that.
But, it kinda makes it a lame apology, although an apology, nonetheless.
(Cut taxes on the richest one percent, make sure wages don't rise for the masses, fund wars,
& jack the poor in every conceivable way
& make sure only billionaires benefit from the chaos.
And bail out the billionaires if they fuck up via corporate welfare, etc...
All ourtesy of neocons, the global elite,
Milton Friedman, his supply-side disciples
& St. Alan Greenspan as their general manager.
What a team.)
From today (below):(
The Crimes of Wall Street: What Are We Going to Do Before It's Too Late?
---
You're right, Kevin. I gotta try harder to tune it all back, emotionally.
At least you've got football season to distract you a bit.
It's too big of a hassle for me to watch sports on television now that I'm married. Not really worth the subtle flak I get for watching it. It sucks that Steve Largent turned out to be a Republican. I used to be a huge fan back in the day. Him & Jim Zorn, wasn't it?
I'm basically a fan of 1970s hockey, anyway.
And I don't know how to time travel.
Thanks again for all the free NYT Krugman articles.
And for the reflection & advice. :o)
Sir Real
Greenspan has already come out publicly and apologized ....
I see today he isn't taking any blame on the Housing/Lenders scams .... 8-)
When I was married I used to go into my shed and build stuff ... like High Voltage projects. A good way of getting away and yet still be at home.
I try and forget the politics of football players it's hard to do with the way FOX promotes politics in everything they show. I use Real Pass on the internet and stream any games I want .... it's the teams local radio broadcast and it doesn't promote anything except the team they represent.
Politics has weaseled its way into everything it seems .... even porn has politics now.
8-)
Nice
2 see my two favorite bloggers yacking...
-Alice
(I wanna be basking in that sun(set?) right now...)
I meant "admitted an error in judgement,"...Kevin
You're right, Greenspan didn't apologize.
I dyslexically wrote that Greenspan apologized.
I meant he admitted he made a misjudgment.
I don't know if it's my old age, Alzheimer's ... or what. But, that was a brain space I made while typing.
I don't have a shed.
Nor do I have High Voltage outlets for my angst.
Just weed & beer.
And throwing punches while I rock out & do laundry.
But I do understand the value of laying low in a different part of the house or yard, sometimes.
I didn't like Fred Thompson's character,
let alone him, in "Law & Order."
(And he says he doesn't remember the Terri Schiavo case; but I coulda swore they did an episode based on the news story, & he was in that episode.)
But it does bug me when Hollywood actors ally themselves with the Republican party & spout the party's stupid talking points.
Bo Derek will never be the same in my eyes.
(like she cares)
But, I demoted her from "10" to "8".
Porn has politics in it now? Cool.
Only fair, since politics always had porn in it.
What would be really cool is to have porn background music playing whenever a politician gets up to a podium to speak. That way the tone is set, & you can sense that the screwing is coming up next.
Maybe have Nina Hartley pick out the tunes to be played in the background whenever Bunnypants gives a State of his Diapers address. :o)
---
Hey Alice. I hope there's plenty of basking in your future. And I'm sure there will be. :)
politician gets up to a podium to speak ///
I always thought of having a Voice Stress Analyzer on them when they talked ..... like a Lie Detector.
ah, but Lie Detector's can be beat, Kevin
That's how I got my job at the Sheriff's Department.
(briefly)
Where they had the framed picture of Oliver North in the hallway, with the caption, "American Hero."
I don't has much experience lying, but the polygraph guy gave me a list of 30 different illegal drugs & asked me if I had done any of them.
Well, I'd done all but one of them, and they left out "smoking toad" & drinking San Pedro tea, & ... anyway.
I had been given the questionnaire to look at days in advance. And, I just decided that it would be me against the machine. And was determined to beat it.
And I did.
The secret to beating the lie detector is to squeeze your butt together (sphincter) like you were holding an imaginary marble, right at the moment you answer each question.
(I did some Internet research prior to going in.)
Definitely works. I lied on every question.
And passed.
Even as my palms were sweaty, & my finger accidentally twitched a couple times.
And I was told the guy who tested me was the most hard-core, best polygraph guy in town.
Led me to conclude that polygraphy is a quack science.
Because I'm very inexperienced at lying.
Imagine how well a natural liar or sociopath could do against one of those tests. (not to mention a couple ex-girlfriends of mine)
Anyway.
Four months later (2 days after getting security clearance to the national criminal database), my one supervisor came in on her day off to join my other supervisor,...to make it look more dramatic, or something. I don't know.
But at the crack of dawn, as soon as I sat down in front of the computer, I was asked to get up, grab my stuff, & was frog-marched out of the place past all my co-workers & a few cops standing in the doorways of their offices,...
Without being given a definitive explanation except that "my immediate resignation was encouraged due to not meeting work requirements," or something. I'll never know what really happened. And don't care.
But, anyway...perhaps a voice stress analyzer would be a lot more difficult to beat.
And on a side note: Did you know that Oliver North's secretary, Fawn Hall, was married to Danny Sugarman, the author of the book on Jim Morrison, called "No One Here Gets Out Alive." ? And did you know Danny Sugarman was CIA? I find that kind of interesting.
But, now I'm not so sure how accurate the book is anymore. And wonder about his involvement with Morrison's death. I believe he was one of the last people in contact with Morrison. Oh, well.
He died recently. R.I.P Danny.
The guy that wrote "The Many Lives of John Lennon" was CIA, too.
Anyway. ;)